Aggregator
Rainbow Kitten Surprise
Public Meeting on December 5th
Stacey Kent
The internationally acclaimed, Grammy-nominated vocalist Stacey Kent returns to Jazz St. Louis for much-anticipated performances! Stacey Kent is a jazz singer in the mold of the greats, with a legion of
The post Stacey Kent appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
[Tim Ream] Two guys from the same town getting to live their childhood dreams😏🇺🇸 Bet nobody had that on their bingo cards?
The Regional Sports Authority should probably use some of their $30M Rams settlement to update their website.
Newly released photos show St. Louis aldermen taking thousands in bribes
California judge buries censorship order in the fine print
A judge in California granted a motion, filed by a middle school teacher accused of sexual abuse, seeking to prohibit journalists from contacting people who submitted letters of support on his behalf. The letters were publicly filed with the court. No media outlet was accused of illegality of any kind.
Restricting future speech (as opposed to punishing unlawful speech after-the-fact) is a prior restraint, long considered the “quintessential First Amendment violation.” Nonetheless, prior restraints often fly under the radar where, as here, judges include them in innocuous seeming “confidentiality orders.” Many media outlets do not have the resources to fight these orders, so their obvious unconstitutionality becomes academic and journalists comply rather than risk arrest.
The California judge entered the order without notifying journalists, even though the public defender’s motion that prompted the order requested that “further unwanted contact by the press be ceased.” Instead, the order included an instruction to the parties to “advise those individuals to whom disclosure of the contact information has been made” of the order. It is elementary that a court cannot tell non-parties what to do, especially without notice or a hearing, but the apparent intention was to intimidate the press into compliance despite the order’s invalidity under the First Amendment.
The public defender sent the order to several journalists, at least some of whom alerted FPF’s U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, publicized the ordeal on Twitter and got lawyers. Fortunately, those journalists are refusing to comply. Lawyers for the Bay Area News Group responded to the public defender by explaining that the Supreme Court has “without exception invalidated prior restraints” and is “particularly hostile to prior restraints that prohibit the press from reporting information disclosed in court proceedings or government records.”
The case is illustrative of the harms that occur when careless judges act as “rubber stamps” for government attorneys. It appears the order the judge entered was actually prepared by the public defender’s office. The motion, presumably to avoid raising a red flag, buried its request to restrain the press in its last substantive sentence. It is entirely possible that the judge did not even realize the Constitutional ramifications of his order because he perceived the request for a confidentiality order as routine. But thoughtless or inadvertent censorship nonetheless remains censorship.
Much attention is focused on the few high profile cases that reach the nation’s highest courts, but the legal system depends on the competence and diligence of everyday trial court judges to safeguard the Constitution. The Supreme Court recognizes that, during pre-trial criminal proceedings, “the absence of a jury, long recognized as an inestimable safeguard against the corrupt or overzealous prosecutor and against the compliant, biased or eccentric judge, makes the importance of public access…even more significant.” But Supreme Court pronouncements are of limited value if trial judges do not understand and adhere to First Amendment principles.
We commend the Bay Area News Group and its attorneys, Jassy Vick Carolan, for not caving after receiving an unlawful order. We hope any other journalists who received the order will similarly disregard it. But the risk remains — especially for those without access to lawyers — that they may not and that the quality of reporting will suffer.
More work is clearly needed to ensure that judges in the Bay Area and nationwide understand the protections that the First Amendment affords to journalists and that government requests to impinge on those protections are anything but routine.
Proposed cuts to balance St. Louis County's budget
Looking for a specific shop
Surprise! Apple never planned to kick Twitter out of the App Store
NAACP branches in St. Louis call on Dierbergs to open stores in north county, St. Louis City
Lost dog spotted on Delmar blvd
SZA wears St. Louis Blues jersey for her new album's cover
Aldergeddon: New 13th Ward
Jury convicts St. Louis man of raping girl at Compton Hill Reservoir Park
Home
Home is a mixed media project of past and present images, paying homage to artist Phillip Hamer’s loved ones. Hamer dedicates this project to his family, the humans who
The post Home appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
Cosmic Sleigh Ride by World of Illumination
A SUPERSONIC HOLIDAY ROAD TRIP Climb aboard your cosmic sleigh and join Santa on a mystical holiday invasion that is out of this world. Shoot past the sun, race
The post Cosmic Sleigh Ride by World of Illumination appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
Wednesday Night Jazz Jam
Celebrate St. Louis’ jazz legacy and future, at the Wednesday Night Jazz Jam. Free and family-friendly, this weekly gathering brings jazz within reach for people of all ages and backgrounds.
The post Wednesday Night Jazz Jam appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
Saint Charles Christmas Traditions® presents A Christmas Carol Stroll
Experience “A Christmas Carol” Stroll along Main Street in Saint Charles on Wednesday evenings between Thanksgiving and Christmas. Walk in the footsteps of Ebenezer Scrooge as you enter the world
The post Saint Charles Christmas Traditions® presents A Christmas Carol Stroll appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
stLouIST