Aggregator
Officer hurt pursuing man wanted for multiple shootings: SLMPD
St. Louis officer injured in I-70 crash during pursuit; suspect in custody
Soil sample from Wentzville Marine’s resting place to be added to Living Memorial Tree
After arrest, Kentucky man says friends told him it would be easier to steal up here
US House GOP struggles to advance megabill against Freedom Caucus resistance
Trump dealt loss as judge rejects executive order claiming ‘invasion’ at the border
Protesters outside the US House make a last stand against the GOP megabill
Lavner STEM Kids Summer Camp at WashU
'One Big Beautiful' bill raises concerns over Medicaid cuts, tax hikes
LC Associate Biology Professor Rosemarie Vithayathil Shines as Mentor and Educator
Alton Residents Charged In Battery, Burglary Cases
South City Comedy Series Back July 5th @ Apotheosis Comics
Lawsuit seeks to block Republican bid to overturn Missouri’s abortion law
Spencer’s pick wins St. Louis aldermanic seat in landslide
Legendary First Amendment lawyers slam Paramount-Trump settlement
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Paramount Global, which owns CBS News, has reportedly decided to settle President Donald Trump’s frivolous lawsuit over the editing of a “60 Minutes” interview with his former presidential rival Kamala Harris.
Virtually no one aside from Trump’s hangers-on believes the case had any merit, let alone $16 million worth. There was no rational reason for Paramount to settle — aside from paying for favoritism, including over its planned merger with Skydance Media.
Legendary First Amendment lawyers Floyd Abrams and James Goodale each recall a time when news outlets were owned by news companies that had both economic and principled interests in defending the First Amendment. They’re alarmed by what they’re seeing today.
“The agreement of Paramount to pay any settlement amount to Donald Trump ... is an ominous blow to press freedom in our nation.”
Floyd AbramsAbrams, who represented The New York Times during the Pentagon Papers case and had a hand in countless other seminal First Amendment rulings, told Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) via email that “the agreement of Paramount to pay any settlement amount to Donald Trump based on a ‘60 Minutes’ broadcast that was both journalistically responsible and fully protected by the First Amendment is an ominous blow to press freedom in our nation.”
As Abrams noted in a letter to the Times, despite the significant challenges the Trump administration presents for media outlets, “it is not too much for the public to ask of the press that it remain vigilant in its coverage of him and militant in defense of itself.”
Goodale, the Times vice president, vice chairman, and general counsel from 1963 to 1980, led the newspaper’s resistance to the Nixon administration’s war on the press. He told FPF in an email, “It’s a sad day for journalism in the United States when the corporate owners of major news broadcasters are unwilling to fight back against baseless lawsuits by politicians.”
“It’s a sad day for journalism in the United States when the corporate owners of major news broadcasters are unwilling to fight back against baseless lawsuits by politicians.”
James GoodaleGoodale reiterated his view, which he also expressed in a prior interview with FPF, that businesspeople unwilling to safeguard reporters’ rights should choose a different industry. “Operating a news outlet is a serious responsibility and those whose other financial interests won’t allow them to stand up for the First Amendment should stay out of the news business.”
Seth Stern, FPF’s director of advocacy, added that Paramount’s settlement and other capitulations by major media outlets “put to rest the myth that billionaires and corporate conglomerates will refrain from meddling with the editorial affairs of news publishers they own. CBS and other corporate-owned news outlets are full of great journalists who deserve ownership that won’t throw them under the bus to make a buck. Americans concerned by these developments should support independent news outlets willing to stand up for their journalists’ First Amendment rights so that our free press can survive this administration.”
Please contact us if you would like further comment.