Aggregator
Alex Van Halen releases “Unfinished,” the last song he wrote with brother Eddie Van Halen
Police say Romanian man in US illegally stole checks from St. Louis-area churches
2-year-old shoots self with gun in St. Louis County; man charged
SIUE's Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering Department Celebrates 35th Anniversary
Senior Services Plus Announces Exciting 50/50 Raffle to Support United Way of Greater St. Louis
Worried about China? Try strengthening encryption, not silencing TikTok
U.S. lawmakers have spent months focused on speculative risks that China will use TikTok to surveil and propagandize Americans. They’re so concerned that they passed legislation to ban the platform, ignoring the Pentagon Papers case’s clear instruction that vague national security fearmongering is not sufficient to justify censorship.
But while our government was distracted by panic over young people reading about wars it finances on TikTok, The Wall Street Journal reported on a “catastrophic” actual security breach known as Salt Typhoon. The hack, which seems to have taken the lawmakers supposedly protecting us from China by surprise, may have given the Chinese government monthslong access to U.S. wiretapping systems used by internet service providers.
On Global Encryption Day, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Senior Advisor Caitlin Vogus wrote for Tech Policy Press that Salt Typhoon should refocus Congress’s energy on serious measures to combat cyberattacks — like strengthening end-to-end encryption, as opposed to unconstitutional stunts like the TikTok ban.
Salt Typhoon should be a wake up call for Congress: Rather than pushing to expand the openings that adversaries can exploit — for example by requiring backdoors be added into end-to-end encrypted messaging services — lawmakers should start looking for ways to close or narrow them.
…
Perhaps if senators and representatives were less worried about grandstanding and more worried about confronting the actual national security threats that China poses to our country, they would have taken a serious look at the backdoors that are threatening Americans’ private data, rather than wasting time on a TikTok ban.
HVAC recommendations- Old U City house with radiators
Bethalto "One-Stop-Shop" Now Open
Illinois Payroll Jobs Up, Unemployment Rate Stable in September
Evergy plans to build two new natural gas plants in Kansas by 2030
Yes, Kamala Harris really does have a clarity problem
Neighbors describe takedown of alleged kidnapper and question how it began
Missouri License System Modernization to close offices temporarily in early November
PRESS Act gains momentum
The Senate should have passed the PRESS Act months ago, after it sailed through the House in January. But despite the delay, the bill to protect journalist-source confidentiality is picking up real momentum heading into the lame-duck session.
The New York Times ran an editorial this month endorsing the PRESS Act and explaining why protecting journalists from government surveillance isn’t just about the press: “This law would effectively protect those who serve the public interest by blowing the whistle on government wrongdoing. And it would help protect all Americans, who deserve nothing less than the full truth about the officials they elect and the government they fund.”
Whistleblowers, the Times explained, are just as likely to expose corruption by Democrats as Republicans. That’s why administrations from both parties have retaliated against them and the journalists they work with. Regardless of politics, “By protecting reporters from having to reveal their sources, the bill would ideally encourage more whistle-blowers to help shine a light on government abuses.”
Now that his hometown paper (along with other New York outlets) has endorsed the bill, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who has said he wants it on the president’s desk this year, hopefully will make it a high priority for his year-end agenda.
It’s not just the Times. The Las Vegas Review-Journal ran its own editorial, explaining: “The legislation is ideological neutral, protecting reporters and editors regardless of their politics.” It called unsubstantiated claims that the legislation compromises national security “absurd” (and the bill has exceptions for national security emergencies anyway). “A greater danger would be to erode the very freedoms that protect American citizens from the perils of government overreach while shielding the state from scrutiny,” the Review-Journal’s editorial board wrote.
Catherine Herridge, the veteran investigative journalist who has reported for everyone from CBS News to Fox News, went on Dan Abrams’ show on NewsNation to explain that “smaller newsrooms, independent journalists cannot withstand the kind of financial and legal pressure that I have been facing for over two years.”
Herridge has been held in contempt of court for refusing to burn a source, and the judge has cited the absence of a federal “shield” law for reporters like the PRESS Act. Her case is pending on appeal.
Abrams’ father, the legendary First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams, has also endorsed the act, joining over 130 signers in a coalition letter Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) organized this summer. And this month, he authored an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal highlighting the need for a federal shield law so that sources can bring important news to journalists without fear of reprisal.
In addition, the Society of Professional Journalists, which represents thousands of journalists nationwide through its dozens of chapters, launched an ambitious online advocacy campaign that includes this video from FPF Executive Director Trevor Timm, who explains that the prospect of surveillance has “chilled investigative reporting and terrified sources.”
The PRESS Act, Timm added, “takes into account the modern media landscape and would protect independent journalists,” regardless of their political leanings, including by barring the government from surveilling them indirectly via their phone and email providers.
You can help too. The ACLU, one of many major national rights organizations that support the PRESS Act, has an easy-to-use form to tell your senators to advance the bill. Or you can email the Times’ editorial directly to your senators’ offices.
And if you happen to be a journalist or editorial board member, please, write about the most important press freedom legislation in modern history.
Learn more about the PRESS Act in our video below:
WATCH: The PRESS Act is the strongest shield bill we've ever seen and is imperative for journalist-source confidentiality.
Here's why the Senate needs to pass it now. pic.twitter.com/jysrKKFofF
stLouIST