Aggregator
33 female looking for friends
Aggravated Battery Charges Filed Against Alton Woman
FEMA Is Paralyzed. Disaster-Torn Communities Are Paying the Price.
From The Wall Street Journal: ST. LOUIS—Minutes after a mile-wide tornado struck this city on an otherwise beautiful day this spring, Ali Rand heard her husband shout as he surveyed the devastation surrounding their tony neighborhood of historical homes. “Everything is gone,” Rand, 38, remembers him saying. The tornado, packing winds of 152 miles an […]
The post FEMA Is Paralyzed. Disaster-Torn Communities Are Paying the Price. appeared first on Construction Forum.
Governor JB Pritzker Urges Illinoisans to Stay Cyber Safe During Cybersecurity Awareness Month
Attorney General Raoul Opposes Proposed Burdensome Restrictions On International Student Visas
Stepson charged in stepfather’s 2024 murder
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seeks Public Input for Mississippi & Illinois River Habitat Restoration
El Molino - A Taste of the Yucatan
Attorney General Raoul Wins Temporary Block On Politically Motivated Cuts To Critical Homeland Security Funding
Gateway Arch, Old Courthouse close amid government shutdown
19-Year-Old Charged with Aggravated Assault in Gillespie Incident
Student journalists fight Trump’s anti-speech deportations
It’s not every day a student newspaper takes on the federal government. But that’s exactly what The Stanford Daily is doing.
Backed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, the Daily sued Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem in August over the Trump administration’s push to deport foreign students for exercising free speech, like writing op-eds and attending protests. The suit argues the administration’s actions violate the First Amendment by retaliating against foreign students for protected speech and chill press freedom by discouraging them from speaking to and writing for the Daily.
We spoke at the start of Stanford University’s fall term with Greta Reich, editor-in-chief of the Daily and president of Stanford Daily Publishing Corp., which operates the paper, about why the Daily is fighting back, even as many corporate media outlets stay silent or capitulate.
Why did The Stanford Daily decide to take this issue to court?
We decided to take this issue to court because we believe legal action would be best for the Daily. Our mission as an independent student paper is to represent the voices of the Stanford community. We cannot fulfill this mission to the fullest extent when a significant portion of students on our campus and in our newsroom are afraid to speak up. The decision ultimately came down to whether or not we felt we could handle the potential negative ramifications of a public suit against the government in order to stay true to our mission. We decided that we could, and we’re hoping for the best outcome.
What happens to your reporting when international students are afraid to talk to your reporters, or when staff quit or avoid covering certain stories because they’re worried about government retaliation?
As we said in our letter from the editors on the lawsuit, fear of government retaliation directly impacts the quality of the Daily’s work.
With every resignation, declined assignment, and refusal to speak on the record, we actively miss out on covering an entire group of students’ voices — as well as the many events and stories on campus that benefit from an international student’s perspective. We are simply not able to conduct our business when speech is chilled like this.
Journalism, and especially student journalism, depends on members of a community not only being able to speak on the record but actively wanting to, at least at times. When an entire subsection of the student population doesn’t feel comfortable speaking with or writing for the Daily, we can’t know what stories are being lost.
When an entire subsection of the student population doesn’t feel comfortable speaking with or writing for the Daily, we can’t know what stories are being lost.
Greta Reich, editor-in-chief of The Stanford DailyHow have people on campus responded to the lawsuit so far?
We only returned to campus this week, so I don’t think I’ve seen every reaction yet, but so far the biggest response has been curiosity. Many of my peers, both in and outside of the Daily, have questions about how the lawsuit is going.
In speaking more in depth with some students throughout the summer and hearing feedback on various social platforms, I know there is a somewhat mixed reaction, though I think it skews positive. Some students, understandably, are concerned about the attention the suit will draw to Stanford as a university. Others have expressed excitement about action being taken to protect First Amendment rights.
I hope that as the suit progresses, students, alumni, faculty, and community members will feel comfortable sharing any opinion with us — we want to hear what people have to say!
How does it feel to stand up for the First Amendment as student journalists when some in corporate media are utterly failing to do so?
It feels great! As student journalists, we definitely face a different set of obstacles and constraints than those in corporate media do. I think that, in a way, these different constraints give us the freedom to take actions like these (though it would be exciting to see more publications taking action too). I am incredibly grateful for all of the support I’ve received from professional journalists and mentors in corporate media, who have reached out with kind words for the Daily. It is not taken for granted one bit.
What outcome are you hoping for, both in terms of the law, but also inspiring student journalists or impacting the national conversation about press freedom?
In terms of the law, we are obviously hoping for the lawsuit to create a real change in how noncitizens are treated with respect to the First Amendment. Whether working for or speaking to our newspaper, no one should fear deportation for what they have to say. In any scenario, I hope those who hear about this lawsuit consider what it means to have a free press and why fear tactics like those the government is currently using have such an impact on it. A central tenet of my education at Stanford has been to form and express my thoughts and opinions with agility. The ability to state these thoughts and opinions publicly is not only being threatened but actively taken away.
And to other student journalists: I am constantly inspired by you and your work, and I hope you are getting through this year with support and engagement from your staff and readers.
Updated St Louis Unemployment Figures | released October 01, 2025
Lisa K Blatt: Red Sky in Morning
Bruno David presents in the New Media Room, Red Sky in Morning, a film by San Francisco-based photographer Lisa K. Blatt. In rare and expected circumstances, such as an eclipse, […]
The post Lisa K Blatt: Red Sky in Morning appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
Jean Mason: Broken, But Beautiful
Bruno David presents in the Project Room, Broken, But Beautiful, by Jean Mason, an exhibition of photographs revealing the earth’s power over our lives, as demonstrated by the June 2025 […]
The post Jean Mason: Broken, But Beautiful appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
Stan Strembicki: Art History Revisited
Bruno David presents Art History Revisited, by Stan Strembicki, an exhibition of photographs revisiting art history, merging portraits of living St. Louisans with various historical artworks.
The post Stan Strembicki: Art History Revisited appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
Joe Chesla: Recent Works
Bruno David presents Recent Works, by Joe Chesla, an exhibition of several sculptures incorporating floating glass vessels that challenge our views of what is up and what is down.
The post Joe Chesla: Recent Works appeared first on Explore St. Louis.
stLouIST