Aggregator
What’s the best nightclub here for newly 21 yos?
Children’s Hospital sets national record for heart transplants
Gore's office adds 5 assistant circuit attorneys, special assistant
Sen. Hawley calls for committee hearing on nuclear contamination in St. Louis area
St. Louis restaurateur opens Kimchi Guys in Edwardsville, will follow with Drunken Fish
Victim's family speaks out after gas station clerk killed in shooting
MoDOT looking for solutions after fatal car crash ends inside Lemay home
Spanish-inspired Idol Wolf to open in 21c Museum Hotel St. Louis
They need to put a traffic light here, intersection of lindbergh in soco near wendy's and honeybaked ham. If you have to turn left across lindbergh you either have to sit for 20 minutes, or just hail mary it
Brentwood's $436M Manchester Road redevelopment approved for $88M in incentives, possible eminent domain
Just learned Himalayan Yeti (Kingshwy) is going to stop offering lunch buffets in Aug. Anyone know of any Indian spots still doing lunch buffets?
Funky Planet Toys & Gifts Celebrating 2nd Anniversary
Edwardsville's Madison Popelar Has Excellent SWISA Meet, Is A Johnston's Law Office Female Athlete Of Month
ISP Announces June Charges From St. Clair County State's Attorney
Apartment area question
Don’t give Congress a censor’s pen
Senate Amendment 218 would give federal lawmakers the power to compel information that they find embarrassing, inconvenient, or politically damaging to be removed from the internet.
Ken Lund via Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0.A new proposal in Congress would give lawmakers the power to censor information about themselves online. As we explain in Tech Policy Press, Senate Amendment 218 would be a disaster for public oversight of Congress by journalists, watchdog groups, activists, and constituents:
Not only is Amendment 218 unconstitutional and opposed by a broad coalition of civil society organizations, it also foolishly trusts social media companies to moderate content well and to act in the best interests of users and the public. If passed, this proposal will make investigative journalism harder and lead to the removal of news and other important speech about lawmakers from the internet. Protecting lawmakers from actual threats to their safety is important, but giving Congress the power to censor the internet isn’t the right approach. Congress should not bundle legislation prioritizing its own privacy over the public interest into the must-pass defense bill.
Read more at Tech Policy Press, here.
stLouIST