Aggregator
Emerson Planning to Invest $100M Investment in Startups by 2026
Ferguson-based Emerson Electric (NYSE: EMR) is planning to boost its corporate venture capital investment by providing $100 million to early stage companies over the next five years.
The industrial giant plans to invest in four to six startups per year over the next five years.
Priority will be given to startups and technologies in areas of discrete automation solutions, environmentally sustainable technologies and industrial software.
Guns ’N Hoses boxing returns to raise money for families of record 10 St. Louis-area first responders who died on duty
TedXStLouis Interview with PGAV Director of Attraction Development
Jim Wible, Director of Attraction Development at PGAV speaks to TedXStLouis on how he was inspired by Star Wars as a kid to be a designer.
From his humble beginning as an illustrator at PGAV, Jim also explains his experiences about how the younger generations inspired him to be a better designer.
His inspiration to develop designs of these iconic attractions and theme parks have been seeing the joy, happiness and self-exploration of kids at these attractions, of which he takes pride in.
PGAV Destinations Developing Master Plan for City Museum
PGAV Destinations, known for world-class designs, exhibits and experiences, plans to expand the guest experience of the St. Louis City Museum.
While preserving the brand and vision, PGAV Destinations plans to work closely with the City Museum team to cultivate the “Cassilly Style”, to reimagine the culinary and retail offering, and enhance the attractions, activities and exhibits.
Graphic novel based on Judas Priest’s ‘Screaming for Vengeance’ album to be released in 2022
Marijuana decriminalization bill on Mayor Tishaura Jones' desk for signature
Has anyone been to Cementland recently?
Any therapist recommendations? Sliding scale or takes UHC insurance.
As market for starters begins to accelerate, will Cardinals stay grounded with their pursuits?
Commission approves $35M incentives for Webster Groves housing, commercial project
Gov. Pritzker signs new Illinois congressional map into law
BenFred: Should we worry about national view of the Rams lawsuit now that the nation is finally paying attention?
‘Do something — today’: Spurred by testimony, St. Louis County lawmakers approve jail pay raises
Metro services to operate on different schedule for Thanksgiving
In case anyone was wondering where those burn marks came from on the I-55 ramp (10/20/21)
Missouri Judge Rules Local COVID-19 Orders Unconstitutional
This story was originally published by the Missouri Independent.
Cole County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Green on Tuesday ruled that health orders designed to stop the spread of COVID-19 that were issued by local health departments violated the Missouri Constitution.
At issue in the case were regulations issued by the Department of Health and Senior Services allowing directors of local health agencies to issue orders, such as closure of businesses.
In an 18-page order, Green wrote that DHSS unconstitutionally granted too much power to individual local health officials and directors.…
Elected Lincoln County Circuit Clerk improperly stripped of power, judge says
Statement on the extension of prior restraint order against New York Times Project Veritas reporting
A New York judge today ruled that an earlier prior restraint against the New York Times should not be lifted, but instead extended until at least December 1. Freedom of the Press Foundation joined fifty news media organizations in signing an amicus brief urging the court to dissolve its previous order.
The following statement can be attributed to Freedom of the Press Foundation Advocacy Director Parker Higgins:
Today's decision to allow this prior restraint of New York Times publishing to continue — and to restrict the paper's reporters from engaging in common news gathering activities besides — is a shameful development. It is a cornerstone of the law in this country that any prior restraint, even a very temporary one, is constitutionally permissible only in the most extreme scenarios. As the Times noted in its briefing on the issue, the result has been that such an order has not been entered against it since the Pentagon Papers case some 50 years ago.
While it's not totally unheard of for a court to inadvertently cross that line, it's rare and troubling to see a judge double down on that mistake even as legal experts have shone a spotlight on the case.