Aggregator
Amid war, Pentagon quashing of reporter access is blatant censorship
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
A judge today ruled in favor of The New York Times in its challenge to the Trump administration’s unconstitutional policy restricting journalists’ access to the Pentagon unless they agree not to publish information that officials don’t authorize for release.
The following can be attributed to Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF):
“The judge was right to see the Pentagon’s outrageous censorship for what it is, but this wasn’t exactly a close call. If the same issue was presented as a hypothetical question on a first-year law school exam, the professor would be criticized for making the test too easy. It’s shocking that this sweeping prior restraint was the official policy of our federal government and that Department of Justice lawyers had the nerve to argue that journalists asking questions of the government is criminal.
“Fifty years ago, the Supreme Court called prior restraints on the press ‘the most serious and the least tolerable’ of First Amendment violations. At the time, the court was talking about relatively targeted orders restraining specific reporting because of a specific alleged threat — like in the Pentagon Papers case, where the government falsely claimed that the documents about the Vietnam War leaked by Daniel Ellsberg threatened national security. Courts back then could never have anticipated the government broadly restraining all reporting that it doesn’t authorize without any justification beyond hypothetical speculation.
“It’s unfortunate that it took this long for the Pentagon’s ridiculous policy to be thrown in the trash. Especially now that we are spending money and blood on yet another war based on constantly shifting pretexts, journalists should double down on their commitment to finding out what the Pentagon does not want the public to know rather than parroting ‘authorized’ narratives.”
Please contact us if you would like further comment.
Mike Mills praises Michael Shannon and Jason Narducy’s R.E.M. tours
How to watch Mizzou's first-round March Madness matchup
Judge Grants Clerk Andreas' Request For Recount Of Votes For Two Referenda
St. Louis challenges court ruling over gun storage in parked cars
Former correctional officer says some St. Louis County jail nurses and guards simply don’t care and intentionally neglect people who are detained. True change won’t happen until the jail’s administration is overhauled, she says.
'Mass on ice' draws nearly 2,000 as thousands join Illinois Pro-Life March in Springfield
Need a quiet drink
Ronnie Wood debuts two new Rolling Stones inspired art pieces
Missouri reports first two cases of severe Clade I mpox strain
Missouri legislators brace for busy second half of the 2026 legislative session
The size of St. Louis compared to the nation of Qatar (normally in the Persian Gulf)
Request for Qualification: Hearing Officers for Commissioned Officer Disciplinary Hearings
Request for Qualification for Hearing Officers for Commissioned Officer Disciplinary Hearings
The post Request for Qualification: Hearing Officers for Commissioned Officer Disciplinary Hearings appeared first on St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department.
stLouIST