Aggregator
Lunchtime Photo
Is the Missouri House violating transparency requirements? Appeals court will decide
St. Louis Swifties join us Saturday for an amazing Taylor Swift aerial show at Aurora STL!
Tenants placed in temporary housing after apartment fire
Reed Burkett Completes Lighting Design Project at Cathedral Basilica
Police search for second teen connected to Clayton killing
SIUE Congratulates Newest SAFB Honorary Commander Class of 2025 Dr. Chris Gordon
Brian Ragsdale, Of U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers St. Louis District, Receives Prestigious National Honor
Edwardsville Police Earns Another STEP Grant For 2024
Activists Call On FTC To Craft Tougher ‘Right To Repair’ Rules, Repairability Scoring System
My Hour With Henry Kissinger
Second teen charged in Clayton's first homicide since 2006
RUCC Becomes a Division of the St. Louis Small Business Empowerment Center
Improv Shop Expands — Again — With New Grove Space
Police secrets have no place in the Sunshine State
Sunlight remains the best disinfectant in the Sunshine State. Last week, the Florida Supreme Court rejected a police union’s argument that a victims’ rights law shields the names of officers who kill on the job. Florida Supreme Court Building 2011 by Bruin79 is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
The Florida Supreme Court decided last week that the names of two officers who shot and killed suspects in separate incidents can be released to the public, despite efforts by a police union to keep them secret.
The court rejected the union’s argument that the names could be shielded under Marsy’s Law, which is meant to protect the privacy of victims. (Yes, you read that right — cops who kill people are invoking victims’ rights laws).
In an op-ed in the Tampa Bay Times, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Deputy Advocacy Director Caitlin Vogus explains how police have used Marsy’s Law and other arguments to withhold officer names from public release or even censor the press from reporting information it already has.
Vogus wrote:
“These intense battles for secrecy by police in Florida raise the question of why officers are so worried about the public knowing their names and so willing to advance clearly disingenuous arguments to evade the public scrutiny they signed up for. … Floridians must demand that the law enforcement agencies drop their anti-transparency arguments that would shield the names of cops from the public. If they won’t, Florida courts must continue to rebuff them.”
You can read the full op-ed here.