Aggregator
Understanding the new CIA mass surveillance scandal
There’s a lot going on in the world, so you’ll be forgiven if you missed the disturbing news last week that the CIA is amassing a significant amount of private data on Americans through a secret surveillance program that the agency is running outside any oversight from either Congress or the courts.
In a letter released Feb. 10, Sens. Ron Wyden and Martin Heinrich revealed only the vaguest of contours of the program while demanding the director of national intelligence declassify the details, so that Americans can find out what the CIA has been doing under their name. Many of the specifics, including what types of data the CIA has been collecting on Americans, remain hidden behind a wall of secrecy.
Just two weeks after the director of national intelligence admitted the U.S. classification system is so broken that it hinders our democracy, we learn of yet another mass surveillance program affecting Americans’ rights that has been totally hidden from public view.
The New York Times’s Charlie Savage has an excellent rundown of the scandal. These paragraphs get to the crux of the matter:
In 2015, Congress banned bulk collection of telecommunications metadata under the Patriot Act and limited other types of bulk collection by the F.B.I. under laws governing domestic activities like the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA.
Yet “the C.I.A. has secretly conducted its own bulk program” under Executive Order 12333, the senators wrote.
“It has done so entirely outside the statutory framework that Congress and the public believe govern this collection, and without any of the judicial, congressional or even executive branch oversight that comes with FISA collection,” the letter continued. “This basic fact has been kept from the public and from Congress."
Digging deeper, these pieces each explore other important facets of the burgeoning scandal:
- Longtime national security reporter Spencer Ackerman, who was one of the Guardian’s lead reporters during the Snowden disclosures, wrote about how “the CIA has been stealing your data for years.”
- Elizabeth Goitein at Brennan Center, who knows more about surveillance law than just about anyone, wrote a really informative article about “how the CIA is acting outside the law to spy on Americans.”
- Our friends at EFF analyzed many of the aspects of the program we don’t know about, and how outrageous it is that the U.S. government continues to use its classification program to hide potentially illegal programs from any public scrutiny.
We'll have more on this story as it develops.
'Fearful and uncomfortable': Nearby businesses opposed to proposed medical marijuana dispensary in Des Peres
Unseen Joe Strummer photos coming this fall in new book ‘Print the Myth’
Organized Retail Theft Effort Stopped, One Charged, One On Loose
MoDOT urges drivers to stay home as crews prepare roads for more snow, single digits
Downtown memorial to honor enslaved who sued for freedom
Tree Work/ Welding
Beverly Farm Resident Kathleen Gastler Chosen To Complete In Bocce For Team Illinois At The Special Olympics USA Games In Orlando, Florida
Madison County Closes Courts and Offices Of Circuit Court At 3 P.M. Thursday
St. Louis Black journalists being lauded by Urban League
Has anyone else gotten incessant scam calls after renting a car from Enterprise?
Road Conditions Across Missouri are Rapidly Deteriorating
Boutique figure skating store serves St. Louisans inspired by the Olympics
Merger involving one of St. Louis' biggest accounting firms to result in $1.4B giant with national ambitions
Federal Judge Declines To Charge Former State Senator Michael Madigan's Inner Circle
The Josh Hawley Mug: It Makes Him An Asshole, But Shouldn't Make Him A Copyright Infringer
Josh Hawley, the waifish fascist Senator from Missouri, has made it onto our pages several times in the past. When he's not advocating breaking up Twitter because he doesn't like how a private company is run (fascist), or breaking up lots of other companies he simply disagrees with (fascist), you can typically find him pretending the First Amendment works the exact opposite of how it does in reality or explaining in published books and newspaper pages how much he's been silenced and canceled. It might all look very stupid on its face, but it isn't. It's actually quite diabolical.
Hawley is a graduate of both Stanford and Yale. And, sure, you can convince me that someone can graduate from both of those schools somehow while being an idiot, but that's not Hawley. When he advocates for fascist policies and generally acts like a right-wing radio talk show host, it's not because he's stupid. It's because he's an assbag.
Now that we've gotten that out of the way, let's talk about the Josh Hawley mug he's selling on his website.
See? He's an asshole. In case you can't see the image or don't know what the issue is, that picture of Hawley was snapped by the AP and was him saluting the crowd of strange people protesting outside the Capital building because their preferred candidate lost. Some of those people later stormed the capital in a violent attempt to overthrow the will of the America people. Now Hawley, in a plain bid to generate outrage, is utilizing that picture of him saluting that crowd in order to raise campaign funds. Immediately after the launch of the mug product, his team sent out an email fundraising on it, apparently purely over the joy of making liberals angry, which appears to be one of Hawley's major policy positions.
Everyone remembers the photo of profa senator Josh Hawley raising his fist to salute the murderous rioters who stormed the Capitol, injured 150 police officers, and tried to hang Mike Pence. Now Hawley is selling a curiously named "Show Me Strong White Coffee Mug" with the same image in an amateurishly designed graphic.
He says its a "perfect way to enjoy Coffee, Tea, or Liberal Tears!" and is "not a pro-riot mug."
None of this is new or creative. The liberal tears thing is at least as old as Ben Shapiro saying it all the time and is probably older than that. The slogan is lame. And the picture, as Boing Boing goes on to note, is from the AP.
In addition, his mug uses an image based on an Associated Press photograph and is probably a copyright violation. AP told Rolling Stone that it's investigating. As you might recall, artist Shepard Fairey used an AP photo of Obama a decade ago, and ended up paying AP an undisclosed amount to settle the copyright lawsuit.
And here is where we take the Techdirt turn. The Fairey case was settled out of court, but we argued all along the way that Fairey's use should have qualified as fair use. I take the same view of Hawley's use of an AP photo. The use is for raising campaign funds, rather than purely commercial use. The photo is being used as political speech. It's at least mildly transformative, although not as strongly as Fairey's, given that most people will recognize where that image is from. And, ultimately, Hawley's mug represents zero threat to the AP's business. The AP isn't selling mugs with the picture on it to those that wish to drink liberal tears.
So while it's fun to discuss what a jerk Hawley is, trying to pretend that we think this is copyright infringement just because I don't like him would be disingenuous. And I, unlike Josh Hawley, am not that.