Aggregator
Apple Opposes Trademark For Indie Film 'Apple-Man' Claiming Potential Confusion
When it comes to silly trademark disputes, Apple has come up for discussion many, many times. The mega-corporation is a jealous defender of all of its IP, but most of our stories have focused on its disputes with companies that created logos that involve any sort of apple or other fruit. Sometimes it's not even companies that Apple is fighting with, but entire foreign political parties. The idea here is that when it comes to logos or trade dress, Apple appears to think that it owns all the apples.
But what about the word itself? Well, the company can get absurd at that level, too. For instance, Apple recently opposed the trademark application for a Ukrainian filmmaker's indie opus, entitled Apple-Man.
Apple in December filed an opposition with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office seeking to block Ukrainian director Vasyl Moskalenko’s trademark application for his indie project. The world’s most valuable company argues that viewers will mistakenly believe Apple-Man is associated with Apple and that the movie will dilute its brand.
“The Apple Marks are so famous and instantly recognizable that the similarities in Applicant’s Mark will overshadow any minor differences and cause the ordinary consumer to believe that Applicant is related to, affiliated with, or endorsed by Apple,” states the filing, which is embedded below. “Consumers are likely to assume, erroneously, that Applicant’s Mark is a further extension of the famous Apple brand.”
Alright, so let's stipulate the following right up front: Apple's trademark on its name is no doubt famous. That affords the company far more protection on that mark than your normal everyday trademark. One of the main differences, however, is that Apple can enforce the mark not only for customer confusion, but for things like tarnishment, if someone used the term in a way that could be seen as disparaging to Apple.
In the quote above, Apple is going the traditional confusion route in its opposition. But that's unbelievably silly. This is an indie film that nobody is going to associate with Apple. It's also, because it's a film, entitled to First Amendment protections that are almost certain to override any trademark concerns, particularly those as flimsy as Apple's.
Elsewhere, Apple argues for dilution.
Apple also argues the trademark, if granted, will “cause dilution of the distinctiveness of the famous Apple Marks by eroding consumers’ exclusive identification of the Apple Marks with Apple.”
But consumers don't have an exclusive identification of the Apple Marks with Apple. That should be obvious on its face. Lots of companies, for instance, use the term "Apple" in branding for... you know... apples. There have also been other films, more specifically, that make use of the word "apple" in their names. There is one called The Apple. And another called Apples. So what does Apple's lawyers see as the difference between those films use and Apple-Man? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Jeremy Eche of JPG Legal, who represents Moskalenko, argues “apple” isn’t a proprietary word and viewers won’t be misled by the movie.
“This is ridiculous,” he tells The Hollywood Reporter. “They really want to own the word ‘Apple’ in every industry.”
Eche contends Apple is a “trademark bully” exploiting the system.
Of that there can be little doubt. So why is Apple even bothering with any of this? Well, outside council is involved, so the term "billable hours" immediately leaps to mind. But Apple's history of trademark bullying also doesn't exactly preclude a haphazard and capricious enforcement of its trademarks. The lawyers saw this one, so they went after it.
And before anyone wants to jump in the comments and point out that Apple makes and provides film content via AppleTV and iTunes... don't. Doing so does not suddenly mean the company can keep a filmmaker from making a film that uses the word in its title, nor for trademarking the name of that film.
Why there's a push to legalize psychedelic drug therapy in Missouri
Are townships a waste of tax dollars? Metro East leader weighs in
'It can be terrifying': Correctional officer details conditions at Missouri prison
Missouri man who maintains innocence in mother's murder wins parole after 23 years
BackStoppers receives $1 million donation from Guns 'N Hoses
Ever been to Up Down?
Vegan Two Alarm Chili
If you’re looking for an easy and delicious plant based recipe to make at the beginning of the week, then this chili recipe is for you! The flavors keep getting...
The post Vegan Two Alarm Chili appeared first on Plant Craft.
No more just the 314: State assigns another area code to St. Louis
St. Louis has yet to spend most of $135 million in pandemic aid OK’d last summer
St. Charles County native Jincy Dunne shares her journey to Winter Olympics
Hazelwood and POWERplex backers urge St. Louis County to keep $6 million in play
Maplewood police investigating shooting
'So unmistakably in the right direction': Pandemic task force expects omicron valley in a few weeks
Missouri’s redrawn congressional map remains in limbo after 31-hour Senate filibuster
A roughly 31-hour filibuster in the Missouri Senate paused early Wednesday morning, when the chamber adjourned without taking action on the state’s new congressional map. Just after 12:20 a.m., Senate Majority Leader Caleb Rowden, R-Columbia, motioned for senators to adjourn until noon Wednesday, when the redistricting debate is expected to resume. Before the Senate are […]
The post Missouri’s redrawn congressional map remains in limbo after 31-hour Senate filibuster appeared first on Missouri Independent.