Aggregator
Apartment Construction is Booming, But Probably Won’t Last
Queens of the Stone Age to play Saint Louis Music Park in September
Man calls 911 for help after garage collapses on him in Jefferson County
Plans for $350M Lake of the Ozarks Resort Approved
Where kids can get free meals this summer in the St. Louis area
Commuters Encouraged to “Dump the Pump” on June 15 for Opportunity to Win Prizes
Major Changes Coming to South Elm in Webster Groves
CITY SC to finish postponed game against Dallas Wednesday night
The Biden administration weighs in on Roger Waters’ Berlin concert controversy
Demand that Fox News reveal confidential source underscores need for PRESS Act
Former Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge, pictured here interviewing Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller, has challenged a subpoena demanding she disclose a confidential source.
DoD photo by Lisa Ferdinando, CC BY 2.0.Another week, yet another story highlighting the need for Congress to pass the PRESS Act and protect journalists and their confidential sources. This time, a judge raised the lack of a federal shield law in response to Fox News’ efforts to fend off demands to reveal confidential sources.
Fox News and its former reporter Catherine Herridge have moved to block demands to identify their sources by Yanping Chen, a Chinese-American scientist who is suing the FBI for violating the federal Privacy Act by allegedly leaking information about her. In 2017, Herridge published several articles for Fox News about Chen and government investigations into her “taxpayer-funded school that markets to the military.”
Both Fox News and Herridge, now a senior investigative correspondent for CBS News, argue that Chen’s demands violate the reporter’s privilege found in the First Amendment. However, in a hearing last week, D.C. District Judge Christopher Cooper mulled the impact of Congress’ failure to adopt legislation like the PRESS Act, noting that lawmakers have “not seen fit to pass a reporters’ shield law.” Cooper also reportedly questioned if the threats to the First Amendment posed by the subpoenas were “overstated.”
The lack of a federal shield law doesn’t lessen journalists’ First Amendment right to refuse to disclose confidential sources. But that doesn’t mean we don’t need a federal shield law to codify that right. As we’ve explained before, a federal shield law like the PRESS Act would benefit journalists and the public in a number of important ways.
First, it would eliminate any question about whether the law protects journalists from being forced to out their sources in anything less than the most compelling circumstances. Cooper’s questioning demonstrates the need for the certainty that the PRESS Act would bring.
In addition, press freedom concerns aren’t overblown when considering the impact of demands for confidential sources, even in civil cases. Compelling reporters to reveal confidential sources undoubtedly threatens the First Amendment, whether the demand is made by the government or by private litigants. Sources who are concerned about being dragged into civil lawsuits, fired or otherwise retaliated against may not be willing to speak to reporters unless they can be promised confidentiality. They’ll be less likely to do so if reporters can routinely be forced to violate those promises, and that, in turn, means less newsworthy information makes it to the public.
Demands from people suing each other for journalists’ testimony or the documents they’ve gathered are also a drain on newsroom resources and divert journalists from their work of informing the public. The very purpose of a reporter’s job — to investigate newsworthy events and issues — means they’re often gathering information on controversial subjects that may result in a lawsuit. Unfortunately, that also means that reporters are no strangers to private parties trying to use them and their reporting to prove or defend their cases. Courts shouldn’t open the floodgates to these kinds of demands. Forty-nine states have recognized as much by passing reporter’s privilege laws.
Ultimately, when the judicial system requires journalists to burn their confidential sources, it harms the public. To protect our right to know, we need courts to throw out subpoenas like these. And we need Congress to pass the PRESS Act.
John Mellencamp on why he doesn’t play arenas anymore: “It was about being a human jukebox”
Lawmakers lament failure of bills aimed at addressing Missouri teacher shortage
Report shows Black drivers in Missouri more likely to be ticketed, arrested
2 points | 0 comments
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/report-shows-black-drivers-in-missouri-more-likely-to-be-ticketed-arrested/article_178efc46-0216-11ee-b31a-37e2ba89741d.html
cross-posted from: midwest.social/post/609991
In today’s “No Shit Sherlock” news…
I guess it’s always good that they “run reports” on this stuff, however. Then maybe someday they can continue to do not much about it.
Lutheran High South Breaks Ground on Center for the Arts
Missouri leads the nation in dog attacks on mail carriers
Wood River Memorial Day Event Was Big Success
In Missouri, more school districts try to suspend licenses of teachers who break contracts
0 points | 0 comments
https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/education/2023/06/04/mo-school-board-may-suspend-teaching-license-after-broken-contract/70271176007/
cross-posted from: midwest.social/post/609939
Missouri teachers who quit their jobs on short notice face increasingly severe consequences, as school districts facing staffing shortages impose financial penalties as high as $10,000 or seek to suspend the teaching licenses of teachers who break their contracts.