Aggregator
Clementine's Launches Harry Potter-Inspired Ice Cream Flavors
Parson names two new judges to St. Louis bench
1 hurt, 1 arrested after shooting at Arby's in Maryland Heights
What’s the cheapest place to get groceries in STL?
What’s up with Pennsylvania?
Meet the winners of St. Louis Inno's 2022 Startup Exit Awards
Sinkhole in East St. Louis swallows car
Highway 44 Shut Down in Both Directions at Big Bend Starting Tonight
St. Louis County man sentenced to life in prison for murdering pregnant wife
More Than Two Thirds Of States Are Pushing Highly Controversial (And Likely Unconstitutional) Bills To Moderate Speech Online
Daily Deal: The 2022 CompTIA, AWS, And Cisco Certification Prep Bundle
Something city residents should be aware of and contact their alders about - problems in EMS
Anyone know where I can get canned or fresh Passion fruit?
Saint Louis University and partners discover treatment for rare, genetic liver disease
Tim Lohmar says he didn't 'flash a badge' during his arrest near Lake of the Ozarks
Neil Young’s ‘Toast’ album, recorded in 2001 with Crazy Horse, has finally been released
Missouri reports single case of rare infection caused by brain-eating amoeba
Congress has a historic chance to protect journalists and whistleblowers in this year’s defense authorization bill
Photo credit: MPAC National
For years now, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has been abusing the Espionage Act – the 100+-year-old law meant for spies – to prosecute the sources of journalists who disclose newsworthy information to newspapers in order to inform the American public.
We’ve written a lot about how the draconian law is incredibly unjust and leads to unfair show trials for brave whistleblowers who take great risks to expose the truth. For example, the Espionage Act does not allow a defendant to tell the jury why they spoke with a reporter (even if their reason was to expose illegality or unconstitutional programs). They also cannot argue that the information they disclosed to a journalist was improperly classified, or that the disclosure caused no actual harm to national security.
Recently, the DOJ — first under President Trump and continued under the Biden administration — has taken the Espionage Act an ominous step further and is attempting to wield the law against publishers. It’s a dangerous gambit that could potentially criminalize national security journalism at the nation’s largest and most influential newspapers.
But that all could potentially change if Congress adopts Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s excellent new amendment to Congress’s annual National Defense Authorization Act.
This amendment is by far the best reform we’ve seen come through Congress since we’ve been tracking this issue. As our friends at Defending Rights & Dissent explain, this bill proposes several vital reforms to make sure whistleblowers and journalists aren’t unjustly persecuted, while still enabling the Espionage Act to be used against actual spies:
- Requires the government prove specific intent to injure the United States
- Requires that the information exposed was actually properly classified
- Permits a defendant charged under the Espionage Act to testify as to their purpose for disclosing the information
- Creates a public interest defense.
- Additionally, the amendment would undermine the government’s effort to prosecute Julian Assange - or any future publisher or journalist - under the Espionage Act by excluding journalists, publishers, and members of the general public from its jurisdiction.
Please follow this link to tell your member of Congress they need to support this bill! The next few days will be critical in determining whether this amendment will make it into the final version of the NDAA.
Our sincere thanks to Rep. Tlaib and her staff for crafting such a vital and thoughtful bill that could do more to help journalists and whistleblowers than anything Congress has passed in decades.