Aggregator
What does the new CDC guidance on masking mean for St. Louis?
David Kutchback, CEO of MERS/Missouri Goodwill Industries, dies
Smaller-brained birds shrink in response to climate change, Wash U study finds
Man pleads guilty to fatal stabbing of Affton housemate
10 Reasons CBD is Becoming So Popular
The waiting is the hardest part: Foo Fighters talk devilish new movie, ‘Studio 666’
As ‘American Idol’ returns for season 20, Lionel Richie says it’s still delivering “talent that goes on to have careers”
Arizona moves to restrict recordings of police with unconstitutional proposal
An aerial view of downtown Phoenix features the Arizona State Capitol and the House and Senate buildings on either side.
Carol HighsmithA misguided Arizona bill would make it illegal to take photos or video of the police in certain circumstances, running directly against long-established constitutional protections for such recordings. Freedom of the Press Foundation has joined a coalition of two dozen media and press freedom groups opposing the proposal in a letter embedded below.
The house version of the bill, HB 2319, passed through the legislature's Appropriations Committee on Tuesday and through the full House on Thursday, despite its straightforward First Amendment problems. The House vote came down on party lines, with the body's Republican majority giving approval.
The original proposal would have rendered illegal recordings of police made without permission within 15 feet of an officer; as passed in the House, the limit is eight feet. Either limit is likely unconstitutional, as we explain in the letter:
We are extremely concerned that this language violates not only the free speech and press clauses of the First Amendment, but also runs counter to the “clearly established right” to photograph and record police officers performing their official duties in a public place, cited by all the odd-numbered U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal including the Ninth Circuit. ... It is clear from well-established jurisprudence regarding this matter that officers performing their official duties in a public place do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy when it comes to being recorded and therefore taking enforcement action against someone who “fails to comply with a verbal warning of a violation of this section” is both impermissible and unconstitutional.
Nevertheless, the proposal now proceeds to the state Senate. We urge the lawmakers in that body to treat the Constitution and its press freedom guarantees with more respect than their colleagues in the House.
St. Louis woman, fearful for her family in Ukraine, helps organize Saturday rally in support of country
Alabama man given two life sentences for Bethalto triple murder conviction
St. Louis police looking for missing man last seen October 2021
9 Mile Garden opens 2022 food truck season with Fat Tuesday celebration
St. Louis digital advertising firm worried about the plight of its 13 Ukrainian team members
Accidents, Injuries, Felonies Revealed
Woman found shot to death in vehicle in Kingsway West neighborhood
St. Mary’s Assumption Ukrainian Catholic Church to host prayer vigil Friday night as Russian invasion of Ukraine continues
Two men arrested in shooting death of North County man
Judges must produce Missouri Senate map before candidate filing closes
Local election officials want new state Senate district maps as soon as possible, Greene County Clerk Shane Schoeller told the Judicial Redistricting Commission Friday. But when the panel’s public hearing was over, no one would say when it must be finished. Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft’s office provided clarity a few hours later – the […]
The post Judges must produce Missouri Senate map before candidate filing closes appeared first on Missouri Independent.